European Stability

24 February 2024 Today we are witnessing an increase in social unrest in Europe caused by out-of-control immigration, falling living standards, the chaotic and uneven development of national economies, centralised control and the limitation of personal freedoms by imposing standards alien to traditional values and the step-by-step liquidation of any attributes of national sovereignty. This chaos is due to the current European Establishment that has transferred the national prerogative of the states to a single center of control and decision. To strengthen it, but using the so named „European Stability” argument, the parties with globalist-progressive tendencies group together, regardless of their doctrines, to constitute a monolith of power. In opposition, a sovereigntist movement is developing with the aim of balancing the balance of power in the EU by increasing national prerogative. These sovereigntist groups are labeled „extremists,” with the Establishment going as far as advocating their elimination. As a relatively recent state that emerged from communism and whose population experienced the horrors of a dictatorial regime, as well as the avatars of permanent pressure from the Soviet empire, Romania can be considered a good case study. In Romania the recent (seemingly) unnatural electoral alliance between the socialist left (Social Democratic Party) and the liberal right (Liberal National Party) for the European Parliament was trumpeted as a victory for STABILITY. Some time before, another electoral alliance, also for the European Parliament, between conservatives (Popular Movement Party), a small liberal fraction (Force of Right) and Progressive-Socialists (Save Romania Union), had also appeared. These two alliances share neo-globalist views, contrary to national sovereignty and traditional values. The only odd body in the two alliances is the PMP, a party with (theoretically) a national and conservative doctrine. Although, at first glance, its presence seems to be a sign of their weakness and insecurity in a desperate attempt to survive politically, its inappropriate place in such an alliance is also suggested by Brussels. Thus, the intention is to demonstrate that system „stability” in the EU transcends the current political doctrines considered historically outdated. In this sense, it is by no means excluded that the RMDSZ (Hungarian Union) be included again in the next government, for more „stability”, but above all to signal that Bucharest does not admit „nationalist extremism”. Therefore, these alliances aimed at strengthening the globalist common front in the European Parliament are moves prepared in advance in the EU laboratories to counter the dizzying rise of the nationalist-souverains current, a current that is gaining speed throughout Europe, but also in the United States with the possible return of Donald Trump. Brussels’ tendency to set up a single political structure makes economic and social development to become the attribute of a super-centralized, imperial-type leadership that controls all social life and imposes a single mindset on the whole of European society. The signal was given by Guy Verhofstadt at the UK Liberal Party conference in September 2018, where he said: „… the world of tomorrow is NOT a world based on NATIONAL STATES or countries. It is a world whose order is based on EMPIRES„. And he also raised the scare of the danger that „extremism” represented by nation states poses to humanity: „Nation states were the cause of the Second World War.” Any deviation from this concept is considered EXTREMISM and must be eradicated. This is the case in Romania but also in Germany where the AfD party is being attacked to the point of being outlawed or in France against National Rally (Marine Le Pain movement). In Europe or in USA, „EXTREMISM” is becoming synonymous with nationalism, sovereignism and conservatism. Under the slogan „STABILITY”, political alliances are encouraged to the point of merger regardless of party doctrines, doctrines which become irrelevant in the context of the imposition of a single directed leadership and thinking. In EU, „STABILITY” becomes synonymous with the existence of a single party. And single party means dictatorship. From a Common Market open to a harmonious development of member states, the ambition to impose an imperial-type political system on a non-homogeneous political and cultural society with well-defined national countries, some just emerging from the prison of the global communist empire, becomes unthinkable. Today, the sovereigntist parties in Europe represent the Resistance Movement against European neo-imperialism. What would be the solution? Should be abandoned the generous idea of a united European continent for harmonious development with respect for national diversity, or should move on to the substantial reform of a system that is failing miserably in the experiment of altering the very spirit of Europe, the culture and values of nations? It is a system which, through centralization, achieves the „performance” of unequal economic and social development of member countries and a forecast of a general decline in the standard of living of Europeans. A cold but absolutely necessary shower would be a massive victory for the sovereigntist parties in the European parliamentary elections. Perhaps it is time for the European electorate to try the sovereigntist option. Romanian version